it is crisp, fast, and awsome. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix) ". Adam007,"a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels"No thanks. It's a trade off. With todays huge variety of digital sensors, each with their own characteristics, in-camera and post-processing etc., much depends on the given combination of your photo gear to create a certain effect. As you can see, the magnification of the lens used will dictate the type of projects you shoot. in the rain. The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. And in their task to get that blurry background, they most often throw their main subject out of focus and/or to focus for anything else in the photograph that would make it, and end results are just "gear porn". Beautiful portrait lens. I enjoied the use of this lens many years before the DSLR. First of all, the background separation and the bokeh: I had photographed lots of animals in bushes before, but never before had I seen the bush melt away in the way it did with the 135mm lens. Aside from being much more affordable, telephoto lenses are easier to transport, easier to mount and easier to guide, and are much more likely to produce encouraging results to a beginner. But first, there are several general rules which must be understood. (purchased for $725), reviewed March 26th, 2013 The Heart and Soul Nebulae captured using a DSLR and the Rokinon 135mm lens. Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. Hate these presumptuous kinds of articles and headlines. If you're using or are looking to buy the Samyang or Rokinon 135mm F/2, please let me know what you're imaging with it or any questions you may have in the comment section below. Tamron has announced its 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD ultra-wide angle zoom will be made available for Fujifilm X-mount. In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. I find 400gm as the tolerable weight limit for a lens on my panasonic gx85, and I am guessing following telephoto lenses would satisfy the itch to get good bokeh shots, 1. you can see here a lot of photos mostly shot with the f/4 version. So, let's see where it falls short of perfection: Typical L construction. We always expect to see some drop in performance (particularly corner sharpness) when we move from testing on a sub-frame to a full-frame camera, but the 135mm f/2L turned in a really remarkable performance even at full-frame. Reg. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC lens is a fantastic companion for the Canon 60Da, as it offers a useful "mid-range" focal length for a variety of deep-sky projects. 21P Giacobini Zinner NGC1499 California Barnard 8 Cr399 Coathanger North America and Pelican Veil nebula HORGB M11 cluster area I do not think telephoto lenses would be suitable for use with your modified camera. To actually learn to compose the photos so that the background complements the image instead of being something that must be blurred away. Excellent color and saturation, a virtually perfect lens. here some information (sorry only in italian) http://www.astrovale-usm/index.html Imaging Resource 1998 - 2023. 135 mm. But this lens changed my mind. I thought I had to sell my 100/F2.8 macro L but thanks for letting me know I can keep it. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens for Canon EF Mount from Rokinon is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and all medium telephoto applications. (purchased for $900). To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. If anything the argument in favor of even smaller and lighter 85/1.4s (like the 600g Sigma DN) is stronger than ever, and I say that as someone that loves shooting at 135-150mm. I have compared many times my 135/2 against my 100/2.8 and there is a big difference. Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. This is perhaps because I'm more of a zoom guy (I have the trio of Canon f2.8 L zoom lenses, with coverage from 16mm to 200mm), and I didn't see that big a difference between my 70-200 f2.8 and my 135 f2except I could cover a lot more with my zoom than I could with a prime. Now I have only the Nikon but I can try to take a photo of the same subject fully open That's why I really enjoy shooting portraits with it. Samyang 135mm f2, 100mm f2.8, and asperical 16mm f2.8. The best 200mm lens is precisely the older 200mm F4 SMC Takumar, which comes with the M42 camera thread, and requires the M42-EOS adapter. Perhaps it's not a big thing, but for a L-graded lens this feature should be expected. I actually have to walk 1/2 way up the stairs to be able get folk in the frame. A specialist lens, at best, though I did enjoy the cat image. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. Not only does it let you travel light, but impressive wide field projects are often more successful when captured under a dark sky. I used this lens quite a bit years ago as my main working lens. You will see why. Exterem apertures are extrems (wether it's full open or closed) that should be reserved for extrem cases. Really excels as indoor sports lens on a crop camera. The extremes are 2 and 22. Great question Scott I think it depends on the image. Large emission nebulae like the California Nebula (pictured below) are a great choice for this focal length. Camera tech for video has come a long way in recent years, with faster autofocus, subject tracking, eye tracking and smarter lenses that stabilize the frame. The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. This brings me to my question. its useful to keep in mind these bokeh circles are the result of light sources bright lamps from autos Christmas lights streetlamps etc and are seriously overused in articles on lenses with strong subject\ backround seperations, they approach parody in the way they characterise subject separation, for most purposes and in most portrait situations its less highlight dominant backrounds that grace a photo. So there - it is not a perfect object. It allows to push your main subject matter into abstraction wide open and get very detailed images stopped down. I want to see the bokeh and the sharpness at 100% mag, don't care about the photos. CAs: a little in the OOF area - not disturbing anyway. Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8. I would love to see his test images. The best ones listed below serve well with a one stop reduction, and some require two or even three stops. A tiny bit of fringing, but that would only be noticed by pixel-peepers. I'm enjoying the Sigma Art 135mm - it's notably sharper than the Canon (which I owned at the same time), and it's f/1.8 instead of f/2. The downsides of this configuration are that shooting wide open can make focusing difficult. Thanks & Cheers I would recommend buying it used if you want to save some money, with the added benefit that you can re-sell it at the same price as you bought it for, effectively giving you the opportunity to "rent it" for free. https://www.dpreview.com/news/7777572944/video-using-the-5-700-canon-200mm-f2-on-the-new-sony-a7r-iii, DPReview TV: We share our 2021 predictions while freezing our asses off, Video: Here's how Adobe Lightroom Mobile works on the Zeiss ZX1, DPReview TV: How to set up Sony's 'Real-Time' autofocus tracking, 7Artisans releases a $195 35mm F5.6 golden pancake lens for Leica M mount cameras, OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. I disagree. However, for $15 I also bought an old Tamron Adaptall 2, 135 mm f2.5. Meanwhile the ol' Canon 135/2 is still commanding a higher than average price on the used market (70%+ of MSRP isn't common), I guess the low weight and super easy resale have almost made it a high end commodity. In this configuration, the lens is still a very fast F3.4. A con is that it really makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. Valerio, Electronically Assisted Astronomy (No Post-Processing), Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Buckeyestargazer 2022 in review and New Products. My goal for this article was to show some great example photos and share some ideas for projects this lens is a good fit for. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. If canon puts an IS on this lens, it would be perfect! http://www.flickr.com/photos/tbrigham/284303834/. This is a very practical way to plan your next astrophotography project, and especially handy when using a wide field lens like the Rokinon 135mm F/2. No rear seals - since the 17-40 Canon has added rear seals to L lenses, to help in weather sealing. I'm not a fan of the large hood. For portraits and with a high MP body I'd be more inclined than ever to just go 85mm, and for other uses it's hard to pass up the zooms' versatility, but I still there's still room for 135s in some kits and some formats. I liked the extra versatility of the zoom and the ability to shoot at 200mm. When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. This way the focus will favor the red light which is more objectionable within a star image than a bit of blue. Some reviewers have listed lack of IS as a "Con". Begun in 1975, the Pentax K-mount legacy continues to this day. The lens is so crisp that the diaphragm blade pattern is visible on point light sources shot at large aperature. Generally, prime lenses have a reputation for being slightly sharper, and I have found that to be true whether I am shooting a nebula or a Scarlet Tanager. (purchased for $900), reviewed November 2nd, 2015 Just plain black plastic (no interior felt as in newer lens hoods). $581.00 for 7 days. A lot of us have been saying this for years. An h-alpha filter would still be useful for your D500, but much more so if it were modified! The model I use feels solid and the barrel is constructed with metal. Best lenses for astrophotography: 50, 85 and 135mm - DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging - Cloudy Nights Cloudy Nights Astrophotography and Sketching DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. The screws should be set sufficiently tightly to prevent shift, yet not so tightly as to interfere with fine focusing. D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. The images were collected using a Canon EOS Rebel T3i camera riding on a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. So so far the best that I have used are the 200f2.8L and the 400f5.6L. Not only does the Rokinon 135 add additional reach, but I can also now shoot at F/2, instead of F/4 on the Canon. I will say that at F/4 this lens is extremely sharp corner to corner when used on my 60Da. The lenses I selected are all affordable prime lenses, easily available on the second-hand market, and adaptable to the EOS system. Canon 300/4 ED IF AF (non-IS) I do not use burst mode, but the lens would produce movie-like frames. Its a trade-off, and one that seems to surface time and time again in this hobby. Below, are a few examples of astrophotography images Ive taken with lenses of varying focal lengths. Canon's 700-200 zooms have IS and are weather sealed two features that the 135 f/2 lacks. Perhaps I missed it, but did you use a clip-in light pollution filter with your 60D and this lens? I've seen several listed but here are more to consider. Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? The lens hood is removable (and reversible), which makes packing the Rokinon 135mm away into the included lens pouch possible. I mount it on my APS-C camera and the focal length literally becomes 216 mm, which is too tight. They were not however designed to be bokeh monsters though that was just a side effect of making them fast and people bought them for speed with bokeh being the afterthought so not Bokeh for the sake of Bokeh as he said. After the first exposure in M mode, the camera throws an error saying Error please press the shutter button again. (purchased for $800), reviewed March 15th, 2010 The CA is pretty low wide open and it rivals my 200mm L lens. Great looking lens, if you ever saw it from the front. The moment I tried the Samyang 135mm F2 for the first time after purchasing it, I immediately felt that it was a very special lens. I use it routinely in preference to many other multicoated filters I tested, including the new Hoya MC UV. Would it at all be possible to at least make sure the people you publish know a little bit about photography? That means that it doesnt require a robust equatorial telescope mount as a larger, heavier telephoto lens would. Required fields are marked *. Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. The first example is good to show that you can take photos of persons in front of an ugly background without completely ruining the shot (important for people shooting events), the last one is the only one I really like (because of the color) but you could shoot this with any lens with short MFD. I shoot dozens of weddings every year but the 135mm stayed in my bag a majority of the time; I just didn't find myself needing to use it. Depth of field at f/2 on the 135 is so shallow that I usually shot it stopped down to f/2.8 or f/4 anyway. Your Baader filter passes 420-680nm and, in theory, a good APO should be able to focus that part of the spectrum with no chromatic aberration. Check them out for yourself! Image quality is great, it is tack-sharp wide-open even though for partraiture, a little bit of softness is needed. I have a 135mm f2.8 lens I've used for wide DSOs but mostly I use 200mm. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. What I see is a photographer who should maybe instead stick to the kit lens, and learn composition first. Is this Nikon already, Astro modified, without need for H alpha filters or any further modifications? The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens from Samyang is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and most telephoto applications. This seems to be the norm for telephotos. The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography. One is its size and weight, which requires a sturdy support on the telescope. Seems to me that with your gallery and website of images you should refrain from passing judgment on who is and isn't a photography master. Another example is the 100mm (or sometimes 90mm) F2.8 macro lens. You got a criticism fine say it politely, and too the point. Here are our top picks for the canon lenses for astrophotography. My 24-70L needs to be stopped down to f5.6 to begin to match the sharpness of my 135L at f2.0 (the test shots were of the portrait of Andrew Jackson on a $20 bill). Then you should have tried the 180mm nikkor ED, the old one, which is the favorite tool of a lot of astrophotographers. 30-35% diameter reduction is usually necessary on "good" lenses. if you really want to get the best gym photos that can be taken, use it and enjoy what you will see. The image shown below covers 4.96 x 5.98 degrees in the constellation Cassiopeia. Recently, the FAA announced that recreational drone pilots in the USA can request LAANC authorization to fly in controlled airspace at night. You can also find him as @mwroll on Instagram and 500px. (cont. Although typically unused in astrophotography, I did get a chance to see the beautiful bokeh this lens creates when shooting at F/2. So I feel I'm being cheated. Also, when used as recommended, and properly guided at full camera resolution, they are all comparable to a field-corrected APO, producing perfect images from edge to edge which can be easily cropped 25% with no evidence of aberrations. People mistake "Bokeh" to blurry background, what is very very common mistake. Simple as that! Everyone should have one? This article was originally published on Micael's blog, and is being republished in full with express permission. My first photo of the night sky is of Comet NEOWISE, however I know its not the best photo I could capture. You won't get the excessive background blurr -- which for the beginning photographer may actually be a good thing. I have the Sony SaL 135F1.8 Zeiss Lens and think that is excellent. These were just a tad less sharp at the corners than their Canon competition, but certainly extremely sharp all over the field if closed down one stop or even half a stop. Deep-sky astrophotography is often associated with a camera and telescope, but the truth is there are a lot of great camera lenses for astrophotography out there. Over the years, I have tried more than two dozen telephoto lenses, until I finally found three or four perfect solutions. The other one is the inevitable and persistent regret that, because of chromatic aberration, the full 75mm aperture of this beautiful lens can not be used in full visible spectrum photography. Some of the primes have a special look to them, but only the 70-200 is indispensable. Before I go any further, Id like to share a photo from Gabriel Millou of the Andromeda Galaxy using a Canon 1300D. You can use Stellarium to preview the image scale with the 135mm lens and your DSLR. Built quality is wonderful, focus ring is well-damped. To shoot indoors under typical gymnasium lighting, you often need f/2.0 or wider to get a shutter speed high enough to stop the action. Stellarium has a great viewport feature that allows you to preview different lens and sensor combinations on DSO's before you decide on the focal length you want. modest cost for "L" series, wonderful optics and fast speed, nitpicking, but not a circular aperature and no weather sealing. Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. For some reason Samyang makes lenses nobody is asking for. Any good ones apart from the Big Boys. Really, just an amazing lens, easily worth the $800-900 it commands on the street. Rudy, why didn t you include any L lenses from canon? 8MP is plenty for the usual 8x10 or 16x20 portrait print. " If so, which one? Many students just wanted to take better snapshots of family, vacation, pets, etc. One is the price, which starts around $800 for the smallest units, and rapidly climbs into thousands of dollars for larger apertures. After several years off, the venerable magazine has held a public open call photo contest and selected nine finalists and one winning image for its 'Photos of the Year.'. The lens has 14 stops when turning the aperture. Amazing for portraits, easily fast enough for indoor sports. It is by far the fastest focusing, best bokeh, and lowest light lens you will ever find. Excellent build quality, fast auto focus, and its fast. Material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of The Imaging Resource. The finish and texture of the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is a step up from the 14mm F/2.8 I ordered a few years ago. If you must have autofocus, and care about weight, buy the Canon. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. Focus are dead on with my Fullframe or APS system. Otherwise I might not achieve focus? I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. Since i am totally new in this field, i would like to start with astrophotography but using my existing camera (Fuji XT-30). The flat lens hood design allows you to easily take flat frames with the Rokinon 135mm using the white t-shirt method or using a flat panel. Well, after lugging that lens around for years, I'm experimenting with adding the 135L back to my kit. (purchased for $845), reviewed November 16th, 2005 [emailprotected]. Yes the Samyang is good and yes there are lenses with bad bokeh. Bokeh == Visual character of the lens optics to render light and color mixing together. Thanks, In the past, Ive covered a number of different lenses, from the Sigma 24mm F/1.4 to the Canon EF 300mm F/4L. I have used and still use the 135MM F/2 l lens. I am still very proud of some of the photos I shoot with a Pentax O450 15 years ago - a good smartphone camera today is at least as capable. The size (3.2 x 4.4"/82.5 x 112mm) and weight (1.7 lb/750g) (and color) of this lens are not imposing - you probably won't get much attent 85 Is a different story, my 85 gets used a lot. The spec sheet for the Rokinon 135mm F/2 boasts a number of qualities, with the ones listed below being the most important when it comes to night photography and astro. It would not surprise me if modern lenses were useable at full aperture. Since I am interested in wide field astrophotography, I bought a new, unmodified, Canon 600D body for use with telephoto lenses. However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. This lens has a long focus adjustment ring, with great tension. Will this ever get old? Along with improvements in telescope mounts, camera technology, filters, and digital image processing, these have allowed amateurs to produce astrophotographs of nearly professional quality. The Rokinon 135mm F2.0 is considered to be a full-frame lens because it can accommodate a full-frame image sensor with its 18.8-degree angle of view. It seems lazy to me. This criticism refers to rare cases when your main subject matter is flat and completely inside the limited DOF range while the rest of the image is outside. Well, if you consider downloading a lens image from https://www.bhphotovideo.com, and photoshop it on top of my photos to cover mistakes, and demonstrate sharpness of a lens with a jpeg that is way oversharpened; if you call knowledge that "the long focal length compresses the background" , If you call blurr a bokeh just because it sounds better, and so on 1000 words would not be enough to point out what a mess this review is Then you are right, I absolutely do not know as much as he does. Zoom lenses are entirely unsuitable for astrophotography due to prominent aberrations of every kind. I also find the other photos not very good. Film Friday: DPRTV reviews Fujifilm's Acros II film, Fujifilm launches Instax Mini 12 instant camera, DPReview March Madness, vote for your champions, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM sample gallery (DPReview TV), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro sample gallery, Live from Japan: Highlights from CP+ 2023, Retro Review: 24 years later, the Sony F505 is still pretty cool, Hands on with the OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro, New FAA rules make it easier for recreational drone pilots to fly in restricted US airspaces, Leica marks James Bond's 60th* with a special edition D-Lux 7, Film Friday: A closer look at the Pentax KX, an original K-mount SLR, Blackmagic Design announces a new Studio Camera 6K Pro, National Geographic selects Pictures of the Year photo contest winner, Sigma brings DC DN APS-C primes to Nikon Z-mount, Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm F4-5.6 Macro sample gallery, Tamron announces 11-20mm F2.8 ultra-wide zoom for Fujifilm X-mount, Film Friday: DPReview TV steps back in time to shoot APS film, Finer Points: Here's an easy way to improve video autofocus, DPReview TV: One simple fix to improve video autofocus, Head-to-head: Adobe Super Resolution vs. ON1 Resize AI vs. Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI, Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. Whos Afraid of a Phantom: Istar Phantom 140mm F/6.5, that is? Images that sing. It actually makes my eyes water as I try to resolve how bad the blurriness is. SIx months on from buying it this has become my favourite lens ever, beating my previous favourite (Leica's 4th version of the 35mm Summicron for its M-series rangefinders). Although your target audience is beginning DSLR imagers, much of your advice also applies to using lenses with CCD cameras. Also, the lens can only be operated when aperture is set to 22, wondering how I could use F2. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. Andysea, those are great images on your website. It seems they are now quite comparable in quality to prime lenses. Often need f2.2 to f2.8 to gain sufficient DOF for human subjects. When all that was available were APS-C crop cameras a 85mm lens provided a near equivalent view angle to the 135mm on a full frame camera. I have heard others mention that this lens has a plasticky build quality, but I believe this aspect has been improved. But for many of us, somewhere in between, are plenty of short to mid-tele lenses that will deliver solid service (in terms of subject separation) without carrying around still another kilo for the sake of more blur. Reducing aperture with the built-in aperture iris interferes with the light path, and results in eight diffraction spikes around bright star images. I should mention that I have only tested this full-frame lens using my astrophotography DSLRs, all of which are crop-sensor camera bodies. It is harder work than using a zoom lens, and some shots I just cannot get at all (cannot get close enough, or far enough way) but the shots I do get are so much nicer looking than I get with any other lens that for me and my goals it is a fair trade off. As I posted on the Petapixel variant of this article, cropping a 85/1.4 shot to a 135mm-equivalent FoV gives you approx. Far from being a generic run-of-the-mill image hosting website, it was created and is still operated by an astrophotographer, and boasts features that are very specific to astrophotography. A camera tracker (or star tracker) is necessary for long exposure deep-sky astrophotography, but a compact model such as the iOptron SkyTracker or Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer will do just fine. So whats so great about shooting at 135mm anyway? i too use the 135mm nikkor[ with a MB speed booster on fuji x for outstanding separation], also a samyang 85 mm 1.4 nikon mt with speedbooster also gives excellent separation, yes, I think I have read that the old Nikkor 135mm f3.5 was even sharper than the f2.8. Thanks.. or.. Clear Skies! reviewed August 2nd, 2017 Wonderful, smooth bokeh. The Rokinon 135mm F2.0 is considered to be a full-frame lens because it can accommodate a full-frame image sensor with its 18.8-degree angle of view. One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. You are entitled to your opinions, and I respect that! They account for much of the disagreement that we see on-line (but not for the rudeness and viciousness of some of it). Colour and contrast is great. The Precious - sharp images, fast focus, perfect weight, reference-quality build. Nothing else like it and the reason the two DC lenses have remained in production since they were introduced in 1993. https://www.dpreview.com/galleries/1180017085/photos/3721717/bokeh. Lior, I have done a lot of reading on modern zoom lenses.
Travis Scott House Address Texas, Mercer Funeral Home Obituaries Jackson, Tn, Articles C